The three keys that prevented Alcaraz from defeating Sinner: why did the Italian win the Monte Carlo final?

Carlos Navarro | 12 Apr 2026 | 19.44

Sinner proposed a perfect match to destabilize Alcaraz. Source: Getty

Streaming ATP Madrid live tennis

🎾 Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Henrique Rocha

Sign up with Bet365 here
Make your first deposit of at least €5
Go to the “Live” section and watch every match

Watch the match on Bet365

Jannik Sinner has come out on top in the first major battle he has faced against Carlos Alcaraz on this clay court tour. The ATP Masters 1000 Monte Carlo 2026 turned into the stage of an uncompromising war, a match devoid, perhaps, of the brilliance we are accustomed to, but with several rich tactical layers to analyze, a trench warfare in which the Italian was more adept at steering the match into his favor.

Ultimately, that was what tipped the scales: the match played much more to Sinner's liking, with the pace and ball trajectory desired by the Italian, launching incessant attacks on Carlos's backhand, always well positioned on the baseline and avoiding the variety that usually makes Alcaraz uncomfortable. To reach that point, Jannik showcased his improvement on clay, with great footwork, a proper use of cross-court shots, and, above all, a substantial enhancement in the weight and trajectory of a fully adapted forehand, after months of work, to the clay surface.

Sinner's triumph is the culmination of months of hard work: dating back to November, with an extra week in the preseason to hone all his skills with a clear objective in mind. Roland Garros 2026 has been marked on the Italian's calendar for a long time, the epicenter of a transformation of which today we have seen glimpses, barely revealed, in a final where he ended up prevailing. What did he do to destabilize Carlos? Where did the Murcian go wrong? The answer lies in three key points:

Sinner tilted the final towards the backhand side, engaging in a constant battle of cross-court backhands... always well placed on the baseline

Sometimes, the matches between the Spanish and Italian players boil down to a vital question: who strikes first? Who conceals their 'weakness' from the baseline? Carlos wants to hit more forehands and Jannik more backhands, a maxim that sometimes peels back layers in this rivalry, yet has delivered glorious afternoons where both seek each other from the first exchange. Today, in a very heavy Monte Carlo, with slow, cold conditions and a wind that robbed the ball of liveliness, Sinner based his strategy from the back to stifle Alcaraz's weaker side... and he succeeded.

Consistently, moreover. He hammered Carlos's backhand time and time again, frustrating a Murcian player drowning in unforced errors (he even amassed 45). Sinner knew how to switch to cross-court shots earlier (and better), but always gained the upper hand by striking repeatedly on the baseline, with feet firmly planted, in a storm that forced Carlos to retreat and relinquish control. Alcaraz did not display the brilliance of other days with the backhand down the line to escape from that zone of the court: the backhand was Sinner's golden cage, a total punishment for Alcaraz (who later, as we will see, failed to find heights and variations to escape from there). Playing in the Italian's preferred patterns also allowed him to find the short balls more easily, extract more errors from the Murcian... and thus gain a substantial advantage of 10 points in medium-length rallies (5 to 8 shots), which are usually Alcaraz's territory (and a demonstration of how decisive Jannik proved to be).

Alcaraz, unable to find his rhythm on returns: the return game condemned the Murcian and deprived him of continuity

Carlos faced a major issue today with a shot, the return, that typically offers him a pathway to suffocate Jannik. The problem, of course, escalates when you realize that the Italian barely hit 38% of first serves in until the tiebreak of the first set... and only managed to get 51% of first serves in total, a very low percentage that should have allowed Alcaraz to attack his second serves repeatedly.

Despite these statistics, Carlos could only create 5 break chances throughout the match. The reason? His return position: on such a heavy and ball-feel-lacking day, where you need to put a lot of power along with accuracy, the typical returns from the back fence, à la Nadal, with great arc and depth... turned into perfect treats for Jannik to attack from the get-go, enabling him to protect his second serves (he won over 60% of points with the second serve, a surprisingly high percentage). The problem? That this Plan A, which usually works for Carlos, remained unchanged: despite its ineffectiveness, the Murcian persisted in returning second serves from the back fence, allowing Jannik to readjust and take control of the point consistently. Attacking on the baseline, going for quick bounces, or opting for slices never became an option... and Sinner won without giving up comfort even with his extremely low first-serve percentage.

Lack of variety: high balls were missing, allowing Sinner to continue on autopilot

That colossal rhythm of the ball from the back that we mentioned earlier found no response from Alcaraz... in the form of different paces and ball trajectories, an element that typically sets Carlos apart in tight situations and has always given him an extra advantage (not a huge one, but a certain edge) when facing matches on clay.

There was no trace of high balls, of parallel backhands that threatened Sinner by hitting shoulder-high, of notably bouncy forehands that would force him into uncomfortable shots. It was challenging for Carlos to unleash variety... and that ultimately doomed him: Jannik had no more than to treat this court as if it were Miami, Canada, or Shanghai, applying his doctrine, that of controlled aggression with a consistent rhythm, without disrupting his game plan. At Roland Garros, perhaps with a sun that allows the ball to fly a bit more, Carlos will need to embrace this principle to unsettle and force the Italian into an ugly match.

A match where Sinner showcased his revamped forehand and endurance from the baseline, where the Italian proved he can win without his serve wreaking havoc... and that compels Carlos to make a move, to bear in mind that the Italian is now an equal on clay as well, and his hunger to conquer the Musketeers Cup is immense. This is just a warning... for him and for us, of course, that the war is far from over.

This news is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, Las tres claves que impidieron a Alcaraz derrotar a Sinner: ¿por qué ganó el italiano la final de Montecarlo?